,jpeg/020/015/090/1280x720.8.jpg)
,jpeg/022/551/146/v2/1280x720.219.jpg)
,jpeg/012/450/526/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/015/457/582/1280x720.9.jpg)
,jpeg/008/515/930/1280x720.1.jpg)
,jpeg/014/763/548/1280x720.8.jpg)
,jpeg/012/175/883/1280x720.8.jpg)
,jpeg/007/349/049/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/005/475/497/1280x720.4.jpg)
,jpeg/010/692/899/1280x720.c.jpg.v1545299940)
,jpeg/006/373/749/1280x720.1.jpg)
ความคิดเห็น
75
J3art 2 ปี ที่ผ่านมาแล้ว
Whats the big deal about letting she-males like this into female spaces ? They look just like woman(they got hips, boobs, feminine face, etc etc), if they have their vocal cord surgery they sound just like them too. I say if a she-male can really pass as female this well and no one notices them walking right into the female area, then let them. They can't go into male areas, they look just like woman. The goal should be to have all she-males look this much like females(and sound like them). Then no one would notice and most would not care.
ตอบกลับ
J3art 2 ปี ที่ผ่านมาแล้ว
ถึง JustKelli : The other argument they have is saying many she-males are still attracted to females. Well bi-sexual or lesbian woman are also attracted to females? Do we ban them from female spaces because they are attracted to females too?
If you ban she-males(this passable) from females spaces because they might be getting turned on(boner) by some females they see, then the next thing would be banning lesbians and bi-sexual woman for lorckerrooms, changing rooms, spas, etc etc. for getting turned on by some females they see. See where this leads to if brought to it's logical conclusion?
ตอบกลับ ความคิดเห็นเดิม
